ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: There has been little evidence to suggest that the IL-6 -174G>C and IL-10 -1082A>G polymorphisms are significantly associated with susceptibility to celiac disease. Thus, we performed the present meta-analysis to explore the potential association between these polymorphisms and celiac disease risk. METHODS: Eligible studies were searched in PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science and CNKI database up to April 20, 2019. Odds ratios with 95% confidence interval were calculated to assess the potential associations. Moreover, we performed the heterogeneity, sensitivity, and publication bias tests to clarify and validate the pooled results. RESULTS: Overall, nine case-control studies involving five studies with 737 cases and 1,338 control on IL-6 -174G>C polymorphism and four studies with 923 cases and 864 controls on IL-10 -1082A>G polymorphism were selected. The pooled ORs showed that the IL-6 -174G>C and IL-10 -1082A>G polymorphisms were not significantly associated with increased risk of celiac disease under all five genetic models. There was no publication bias. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis summarizing all of the available studies on the association of IL-6 -174G>C and IL-10 -1082A>G polymorphisms with celiac disease. Our results suggest that the IL-6 -174G>C and IL-10 -1082A>G polymorphisms may not be associated with increased risk of celiac disease. Moreover, large and well-designed studies are needed to fully describe the association of IL-6 -174G>C and IL-10 -1082A>G polymorphisms with celiac disease.
RESUMO CONTEXTO: Há poucas evidências para sugerir que os IL-6 -174G>C e IL-10 -1082A>G polimorfismos são significativamente associados com susceptibilidade para doença celíaca. Assim, foi realizada a presente meta-análise para explorar a potencial associação entre estes polimorfismos com o risco de doença celíaca. MÉTODOS: Foram pesquisados estudos elegíveis no Pubmed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science e CNKI Database até abril de 2019. Razões de probabilidades com 95% de intervalo de confiança foram calculados para avaliar as potenciais associações. Além disso, observou-se a heterogeneidade, a sensibilidade e o viés de publicação para esclarecer e validar os resultados agrupados. RESULTADOS: No total, nove estudos caso-controle envolvendo cinco estudos com 737 casos e 1.338 controle em IL-6 -174G>C polimorfismo e quatro estudos com 923 casos e 864 controles em IL-10 -1082A>G polimorfismo foram selecionados. As razões de probabilidade mostraram que o IL-6 -174G>C e IL-10 -1082A>G polimorfismos não estavam significativamente associados com aumento risco de doença celíaca nos cinco modelos genéticos. Não foi detectado viés de publicação. CONCLUSÃO: Pelo nosso conhecimento esta é a primeira meta-análise resumindo todos estudos disponíveis para associação de IL-6 -174G>C e IL-10 -1082A>G polimorfismos com doença celíaca. Estes resultados sugerem que os IL-6 -174G>C e IL-10 -1082A>G polimorfismos podem não ser associados com aumento risco de doença celíaca. Além disso, maiores estudos e mais bem desenhados são necessários para descrever totalmente a associação de IL-6 -174G>C e IL-10 -1082A>G polimorfismos com doença celíaca.
Subject(s)
Humans , Polymorphism, Genetic , Celiac Disease/genetics , Interleukin-6/genetics , Interleukin-10/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Case-Control Studies , Odds Ratio , Meta-Analysis as Topic , GenotypeABSTRACT
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence to show that TNF-α -308G>A polymorphism may be a risk factor for celiac disease, but the results are inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: Thus, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis involving published studies up to January 2019 to elucidate the association. METHODS: To assess the effect of TNF-α -308G>A polymorphism on celiac disease susceptibility, we searched PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases to identify eligible studies, without restriction. Summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the susceptibility to celiac disease. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies with 1147 cases and 1774 controls were selected for this meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that TNF-α -308G>A polymorphism was associated with increased risk of celiac disease (A vs G: OR=2.077, 95% CI=1.468-2.939, P=≤0.001; AA vs GG: OR=8.512, 95% CI=3.740-19.373, P=≤0.001; AA+AG vs GG: OR=1.869, 95% CI=1.161-3.008, P=0.010; and AA+AG vs GG: OR=4.773, 95% CI=3.181-7.162, P≤0.001). Subgroup analysis by ethnicity also revealed significant association in Caucasians. In addition, there was a significant association between TNF-α -308G>A polymorphism and celiac disease risk in Italy, Spain and PCR-FRLP group studies. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis suggests that the TNF-α -308G>A polymorphism plays an important role in celiac disease susceptibility. However, our results are still needed to strengthen by further studies in different ethnicities and larger sample sizes.
RESUMO CONTEXTO: Há evidências crescentes para mostrar que o TNF-α-308G>A polimorfismo pode ser um fator de risco para a doença celíaca, mas os resultados são inconsistentes. OBJETIVO: Por isto objetivou-se realizar uma meta-análise envolvendo estudos publicados até janeiro de 2019 para elucidar esta associação. MÉTODOS: Para avaliar o efeito do TNF-α-308G>A polimorfismo na suscetibilidade da doença celíaca, pesquisou-se os bancos de dados do PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge e Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) para identificar estudos elegíveis, sem restrições. Para avaliar a suscetibilidade à doença celíaca, foram utilizadas os odds ratio sumários (ORs) e os intervalos de confiança de 95% (ICs). RESULTADOS: Um total de 11 estudos com 1147 casos e 1774 controles foram selecionados para esta meta-análise. Os resultados agrupados indicaram que o TNF-α-308G>A polimorfismo associou-se ao aumento do risco de doença celíaca (A vs G: OR=2,077; 95% IC=1,468-2,939; P=≤0,001; AA vs GG: OR=8,512; 95% IC=3,740-19,373; P=≤0,001; AA+AG vs GG: OR=1,869; 95% IC=1,161-3,008; P=0,010; e AA+AG vs GG: OR=4,773; 95% IC=3,181-7,162; P≤0,001). A análise de subgrupos por etnia também revelou associação significativa em caucasianos. Além, havia uma associação significativa entre o TNF-α-308G>A um polimorfismo e o risco do doença celíaca na Italia, na Espanha e em estudos do grupo do PCR-FRLP. CONCLUSÃO: Nossa meta-análise sugere que o TNF-α-308G>A polimorfismo desempenha um papel importante na suscetibilidade da doença celíaca. No entanto, nossos resultados necessitam de mais dados e de serem fortalecidos por outros estudos em diferentes etnias e tamanhos amostrais maiores.
Subject(s)
Humans , Celiac Disease/genetics , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide/genetics , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Introduction: The present study examined the relation between managers’ leadership style and burnout through career self-efficacy in the framework of a scientific model. Methodology: The study participants included 240 nurses (205 women, 35 men) from Shiraz city hospitals who were selected based on random multistage cluster sampling method. The participants completed three questionnaires of leadership style inventory, career self-efficacy and burnout. The model was analyzed using multiple regression method in simultaneous style based on Baron & Kenni stages. Results & Conclusion: The results showed that: a) managers leadership style is predictive of burnout dimensions, b) managers leadership style is predictive of career self -efficacy dimensions. Totally, the present study findings and Sobel test results showed that career self-efficacy has a moderate role between managers’ leadership style and burnout.